<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 800 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199666</link>
    <description>Spent palladium catalyst could not be brought within the taxing net unless marketability was established on the material before the Court. The Department bore the burden of proving that the spent catalyst was a marketable commodity, but the record did not satisfy that test. On that basis, no ground was made out to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s finding, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 10:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 800 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199666</link>
      <description>Spent palladium catalyst could not be brought within the taxing net unless marketability was established on the material before the Court. The Department bore the burden of proving that the spent catalyst was a marketable commodity, but the record did not satisfy that test. On that basis, no ground was made out to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s finding, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>