<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 389 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356686</link>
    <description>A writ petition under Article 226 was held premature where no accrued cause of action had arisen and no impugned action, notice, or order had been issued under the GST regime. The High Court noted that, in the absence of any actionable grievance, the questions raised were merely academic and not fit for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 389 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356686</link>
      <description>A writ petition under Article 226 was held premature where no accrued cause of action had arisen and no impugned action, notice, or order had been issued under the GST regime. The High Court noted that, in the absence of any actionable grievance, the questions raised were merely academic and not fit for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>