<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 383 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356680</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial legal questions arose from the treatment of foreign exchange losses and the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the consistent approach of the assessee in handling foreign exchange gains and losses and the insignificance of the amount in the cash transaction disallowance. The decision was based on the lack of substantial legal issues regarding these matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 383 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356680</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial legal questions arose from the treatment of foreign exchange losses and the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the consistent approach of the assessee in handling foreign exchange gains and losses and the insignificance of the amount in the cash transaction disallowance. The decision was based on the lack of substantial legal issues regarding these matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>