<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that the assessee retained the right to appeal against the disallowance of freight and forwarding charges in the re-assessment. The Tribunal found that the charges were appropriately debited and no double deduction occurred, leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 6,33,344. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the disallowance was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:58:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that the assessee retained the right to appeal against the disallowance of freight and forwarding charges in the re-assessment. The Tribunal found that the charges were appropriately debited and no double deduction occurred, leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 6,33,344. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the disallowance was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>