<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 377 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356674</link>
    <description>Liabilities assumed on acquisition of an undertaking as a going concern, including gratuity, provident fund, bonus and other accrued statutory dues of the vendor, may form part of the composite acquisition cost, but they do not by themselves become depreciable assets. Depreciation under section 32 is confined to specified asset classes such as buildings, machinery, plant, furniture and eligible intangibles, so an assumed vendor liability cannot be depreciated merely because it was capitalised in the buyer&#039;s books. On that basis, the claim for depreciation on the transferred employee and statutory liabilities was held unsustainable, and the disallowance was not to be restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 377 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356674</link>
      <description>Liabilities assumed on acquisition of an undertaking as a going concern, including gratuity, provident fund, bonus and other accrued statutory dues of the vendor, may form part of the composite acquisition cost, but they do not by themselves become depreciable assets. Depreciation under section 32 is confined to specified asset classes such as buildings, machinery, plant, furniture and eligible intangibles, so an assumed vendor liability cannot be depreciated merely because it was capitalised in the buyer&#039;s books. On that basis, the claim for depreciation on the transferred employee and statutory liabilities was held unsustainable, and the disallowance was not to be restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>