<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 375 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356672</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the penalty levied under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The assessee&#039;s business decisions and the genuineness of the transactions were acknowledged, leading to the deletion of the penalty. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty under Section 271E was ultimately deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 375 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356672</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the penalty levied under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The assessee&#039;s business decisions and the genuineness of the transactions were acknowledged, leading to the deletion of the penalty. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty under Section 271E was ultimately deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>