<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12181</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras held that the amended rule 5, effective from April 2, 1983, would not apply to the assessment year 1983-84. The law applicable for assessment is the one in force at the beginning of the assessment year, with amendments applying to subsequent years. The ruling favored the Revenue over the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12181</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras held that the amended rule 5, effective from April 2, 1983, would not apply to the assessment year 1983-84. The law applicable for assessment is the one in force at the beginning of the assessment year, with amendments applying to subsequent years. The ruling favored the Revenue over the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>