<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 368 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Department&#039;s classification of goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1962, ruled on the jurisdiction of Central Excise officers under Customs Rules, 1996, and determined the inadmissibility of duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus., dated 01.03.2005. The judgment favored the appellant based on jurisdictional issues, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 368 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Department&#039;s classification of goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1962, ruled on the jurisdiction of Central Excise officers under Customs Rules, 1996, and determined the inadmissibility of duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus., dated 01.03.2005. The judgment favored the appellant based on jurisdictional issues, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>