<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 363 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the appellant company, setting aside the redemption fine and the penalty imposed on the Director, while upholding the penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 363 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the appellant company, setting aside the redemption fine and the penalty imposed on the Director, while upholding the penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>