https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356657 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order demanding customs duty, additional duty, and penalties against the appellant for availing double benefits, failing export obligations, and non-compliance with Notification No.83/90-Cus conditions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the confiscation of imported goods and imposition of fines and penalties under the Customs Act. The Tribunal rejected arguments on procedural conditions, CVD liability, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation, emphasizing the importance of compliance and prevention of misuse of imported goods. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356657 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order demanding customs duty, additional duty, and penalties against the appellant for availing double benefits, failing export obligations, and non-compliance with Notification No.83/90-Cus conditions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the confiscation of imported goods and imposition of fines and penalties under the Customs Act. The Tribunal rejected arguments on procedural conditions, CVD liability, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation, emphasizing the importance of compliance and prevention of misuse of imported goods. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356657