https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356644 The appellant, involved in manufacturing excisable goods, faced a central excise duty demand of Rs. 19,89,229.00. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld a duty demand of Rs. 16,99,881.00, reducing the penalty amount. The reversal of Cenvat Credit and demand on purchased items were dropped in favor of the appellant. However, the demand on a parallel set of Invoices was confirmed due to irregularities. The appellant's application for additional evidence was rejected. The Tribunal allowed a reduced penalty payment of 25% of the duty amount and dismissed the additional evidence application. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356644 The appellant, involved in manufacturing excisable goods, faced a central excise duty demand of Rs. 19,89,229.00. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld a duty demand of Rs. 16,99,881.00, reducing the penalty amount. The reversal of Cenvat Credit and demand on purchased items were dropped in favor of the appellant. However, the demand on a parallel set of Invoices was confirmed due to irregularities. The appellant's application for additional evidence was rejected. The Tribunal allowed a reduced penalty payment of 25% of the duty amount and dismissed the additional evidence application. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356644