<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 73 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12178</link>
    <description>Interest on securities, bonds and debentures held by a banking company as permanent investments is not chargeable to interest-tax under section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act, 1974, because the Act taxes interest on loans and advances and not investment income. The Court treated the omission of the earlier express exclusion of interest on securities from section 2(7) as clarificatory, not as widening the charging provision. It also distinguished lending from investing in banking accounts and balance-sheets, noted the limited role of section 26C, and held that taxing Government securities held as permanent investments would be inconsistent with the Act&#039;s anti-inflationary object.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 73 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12178</link>
      <description>Interest on securities, bonds and debentures held by a banking company as permanent investments is not chargeable to interest-tax under section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act, 1974, because the Act taxes interest on loans and advances and not investment income. The Court treated the omission of the earlier express exclusion of interest on securities from section 2(7) as clarificatory, not as widening the charging provision. It also distinguished lending from investing in banking accounts and balance-sheets, noted the limited role of section 26C, and held that taxing Government securities held as permanent investments would be inconsistent with the Act&#039;s anti-inflationary object.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>