<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 342 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356639</link>
    <description>The 1st Appellate Authority allowed the appeal for refund of CENVAT credit on inputs like blast furnace slag and furnace oil, emphasizing that the ground granulated blast furnace slag is a refined form of the inputs and eligible for credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Authority cited broader interpretation of &quot;manufacture&quot; for exported goods and previous decisions by the CESTAT, leading to the conclusion that the refund claim should be allowed. The Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the respondent is entitled to the refund amount, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against availing credit on exempted products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:49:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 342 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356639</link>
      <description>The 1st Appellate Authority allowed the appeal for refund of CENVAT credit on inputs like blast furnace slag and furnace oil, emphasizing that the ground granulated blast furnace slag is a refined form of the inputs and eligible for credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Authority cited broader interpretation of &quot;manufacture&quot; for exported goods and previous decisions by the CESTAT, leading to the conclusion that the refund claim should be allowed. The Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the respondent is entitled to the refund amount, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against availing credit on exempted products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>