https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356628 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority due to violations of natural justice, including the rejection of remission claims without a personal hearing and lack of opportunity for the appellant to defend their case. The inconsistency in accepting values and the absence of conclusive findings in the Ld. Commissioner's order were also highlighted, emphasizing the need for a more thorough assessment process. The importance of timely reporting of incidents and submission of necessary documents for proper verification of claims was underscored, with the Tribunal stressing the significance of providing appellants with a fair chance to present their case. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:49:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356628 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority due to violations of natural justice, including the rejection of remission claims without a personal hearing and lack of opportunity for the appellant to defend their case. The inconsistency in accepting values and the absence of conclusive findings in the Ld. Commissioner's order were also highlighted, emphasizing the need for a more thorough assessment process. The importance of timely reporting of incidents and submission of necessary documents for proper verification of claims was underscored, with the Tribunal stressing the significance of providing appellants with a fair chance to present their case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356628