<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 322 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration, directing the original authority to notify the appellant about any verification report used against them. The decision emphasized that subsequent reversal of credit equates to not availing CENVAT credit, aligning with Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:48:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 322 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration, directing the original authority to notify the appellant about any verification report used against them. The decision emphasized that subsequent reversal of credit equates to not availing CENVAT credit, aligning with Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>