https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199653 A review application against an order of a Division Bench in Article 226 proceedings must be heard by a Bench of two Judges, not by a single Judge, where the High Court rules so provide. The court recognised that review in writ jurisdiction is available to prevent miscarriage of justice or correct a grave and palpable error, but only within the limits of the governing rules. Order XLVII Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply proprio vigore to writ proceedings so as to displace those rules. The procedural requirement was therefore that the review be placed before a Bench of the same strength, or at least two Judges. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:10:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199653 A review application against an order of a Division Bench in Article 226 proceedings must be heard by a Bench of two Judges, not by a single Judge, where the High Court rules so provide. The court recognised that review in writ jurisdiction is available to prevent miscarriage of justice or correct a grave and palpable error, but only within the limits of the governing rules. Order XLVII Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply proprio vigore to writ proceedings so as to displace those rules. The procedural requirement was therefore that the review be placed before a Bench of the same strength, or at least two Judges. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199653