<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 512 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199646</link>
    <description>Property tax under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act attaches to the land or building as a first charge, and the transferee of a flat is treated as liable for that tax even if notice under Section 126 is served later. The text explains that Section 128 does not extinguish the transferee&#039;s statutory obligation; until transfer is intimated, notice to the transferor remains valid for assessment purposes. It also states that failure to notify the Corporation of the transfer does not protect the transferee from assessment or recovery, especially where a valid prior assessment already exists and continues to bind the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 512 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199646</link>
      <description>Property tax under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act attaches to the land or building as a first charge, and the transferee of a flat is treated as liable for that tax even if notice under Section 126 is served later. The text explains that Section 128 does not extinguish the transferee&#039;s statutory obligation; until transfer is intimated, notice to the transferor remains valid for assessment purposes. It also states that failure to notify the Corporation of the transfer does not protect the transferee from assessment or recovery, especially where a valid prior assessment already exists and continues to bind the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>