<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 39 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12170</link>
    <description>In a search block assessment, the HC considered whether cash credits recorded in regular books could be excluded from block computation and whether the loans were genuine under s. 68 principles. Where creditors (other than one) appeared, confirmed the loans, disclosed sources, and their identities were undisputed, the assessee was held to have discharged the initial burden; given the petty amounts, lack of creditworthiness could not be inferred, so no addition could be made for those credits. For the lone creditor who neither appeared nor filed confirmation, genuineness was not established, and the AO&#039;s addition was restored. The HC further held that mere recording in regular books does not bar taxation in block assessment if the income was not taxed in regular assessments; the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 39 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12170</link>
      <description>In a search block assessment, the HC considered whether cash credits recorded in regular books could be excluded from block computation and whether the loans were genuine under s. 68 principles. Where creditors (other than one) appeared, confirmed the loans, disclosed sources, and their identities were undisputed, the assessee was held to have discharged the initial burden; given the petty amounts, lack of creditworthiness could not be inferred, so no addition could be made for those credits. For the lone creditor who neither appeared nor filed confirmation, genuineness was not established, and the AO&#039;s addition was restored. The HC further held that mere recording in regular books does not bar taxation in block assessment if the income was not taxed in regular assessments; the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>