https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199643 Cases arising from the same transaction but resting on materially contradictory and mutually exclusive prosecution versions should not be clubbed and consolidated under Section 223 CrPC. The safeguard against double jeopardy under Article 20(2) and Section 300 CrPC is preserved by trying the matters together before the same court, while recording evidence separately in each case and deciding each on its own record. Common witnesses may be examined once and their evidence read in the other case, but the proceedings must end in separate judgments. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:47:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199643 Cases arising from the same transaction but resting on materially contradictory and mutually exclusive prosecution versions should not be clubbed and consolidated under Section 223 CrPC. The safeguard against double jeopardy under Article 20(2) and Section 300 CrPC is preserved by trying the matters together before the same court, while recording evidence separately in each case and deciding each on its own record. Common witnesses may be examined once and their evidence read in the other case, but the proceedings must end in separate judgments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199643