https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199640 A maintenance charge created by a 1919 deed was not invalid merely because it was intended to operate in perpetuity, but it could not be enforced against an undefined share that might devolve on a particular heir, as that would unlawfully burden an uncertain inheritance in a manner inconsistent with Mohammedan law. The charge therefore failed against Marghub Hasan's unascertained share and could not affect the sons of Faruqunnissa by merger. An auction-purchaser of Iqbal Hasan's interest, however, was bound by the earlier decree enforcing the charge against that very share, so the charge continued on the purchased property to the extent fixed by the Court. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 1933 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:04:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199640 A maintenance charge created by a 1919 deed was not invalid merely because it was intended to operate in perpetuity, but it could not be enforced against an undefined share that might devolve on a particular heir, as that would unlawfully burden an uncertain inheritance in a manner inconsistent with Mohammedan law. The charge therefore failed against Marghub Hasan's unascertained share and could not affect the sons of Faruqunnissa by merger. An auction-purchaser of Iqbal Hasan's interest, however, was bound by the earlier decree enforcing the charge against that very share, so the charge continued on the purchased property to the extent fixed by the Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Sep 1933 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199640