https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199636 An exemption notification issued under the repealed rent restriction law continued to operate after repeal and re-enactment because the saving provisions preserved prior notifications and actions, and the later amendment did not extinguish that exemption. The court found no inconsistency between the Government's power to exempt classes of buildings and the continued effect of the earlier notification. As a result, the civil court retained jurisdiction to entertain the landlord's ejectment suit, and the tenant's jurisdictional objection failed. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 12:44:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199636 An exemption notification issued under the repealed rent restriction law continued to operate after repeal and re-enactment because the saving provisions preserved prior notifications and actions, and the later amendment did not extinguish that exemption. The court found no inconsistency between the Government's power to exempt classes of buildings and the continued effect of the earlier notification. As a result, the civil court retained jurisdiction to entertain the landlord's ejectment suit, and the tenant's jurisdictional objection failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199636