<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 517 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199635</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court upheld the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 as a valid social welfare measure within legislative competence, holding that its classification of premises and tenants by area, nature of premises and rent level satisfied the test of intelligible differentia and did not offend Article 14. It also construed Section 32(3)(a) narrowly, applying harmonious construction to resolve conflict between the repealed Act and the new statutory scheme. Pending proceedings for standard rent or provisional rent under Sections 6 and 7 of the old Act were held to be governed by the new Act to the extent of incompatibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 12:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 517 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199635</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan High Court upheld the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 as a valid social welfare measure within legislative competence, holding that its classification of premises and tenants by area, nature of premises and rent level satisfied the test of intelligible differentia and did not offend Article 14. It also construed Section 32(3)(a) narrowly, applying harmonious construction to resolve conflict between the repealed Act and the new statutory scheme. Pending proceedings for standard rent or provisional rent under Sections 6 and 7 of the old Act were held to be governed by the new Act to the extent of incompatibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>