https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199634 The court dismissed the civil revision, affirming that Section 69 of the Partnership Act, 1932, requires firms to be registered before initiating suits. The court held that the registration of the firm during the suit did not cure the initial defect, emphasizing the imperative nature of Section 69's requirements. The plaintiff was advised to file a fresh plaint to comply with the Act's provisions. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 12:18:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199634 The court dismissed the civil revision, affirming that Section 69 of the Partnership Act, 1932, requires firms to be registered before initiating suits. The court held that the registration of the firm during the suit did not cure the initial defect, emphasizing the imperative nature of Section 69's requirements. The plaintiff was advised to file a fresh plaint to comply with the Act's provisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Sep 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199634