<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12164</link>
    <description>The court held that the amended Section 249(4) of the Income-tax Act applied to the assessee&#039;s appeals as the &#039;lis&#039; commenced after the amendment&#039;s effective date. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the case was remanded for further consideration. The court rejected retrospective application of procedural amendments, emphasizing the importance of the commencement of the &#039;lis&#039; in determining the applicability of amended laws. Appeals against penalties were deemed to fall under Section 249(4). The assessment years were deemed irrelevant, and the correct commencement date of the &#039;lis&#039; was crucial in deciding the case outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12164</link>
      <description>The court held that the amended Section 249(4) of the Income-tax Act applied to the assessee&#039;s appeals as the &#039;lis&#039; commenced after the amendment&#039;s effective date. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the case was remanded for further consideration. The court rejected retrospective application of procedural amendments, emphasizing the importance of the commencement of the &#039;lis&#039; in determining the applicability of amended laws. Appeals against penalties were deemed to fall under Section 249(4). The assessment years were deemed irrelevant, and the correct commencement date of the &#039;lis&#039; was crucial in deciding the case outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>