<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 319 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process against the respondent-corporate debtor, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s defense regarding the quality of goods was not credible and lacked evidence, ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 319 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process against the respondent-corporate debtor, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s defense regarding the quality of goods was not credible and lacked evidence, ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>