<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356614</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC note records that substantial questions of law were not entertained on placement fees and carriage fees under section 194C, reimbursement of expenses, commission payments, and alleged short deduction under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). The appeal was admitted only on the questions relating to programme software purchases and event managers, limiting the scope of further consideration to those remaining issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356614</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC note records that substantial questions of law were not entertained on placement fees and carriage fees under section 194C, reimbursement of expenses, commission payments, and alleged short deduction under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). The appeal was admitted only on the questions relating to programme software purchases and event managers, limiting the scope of further consideration to those remaining issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>