<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 306 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the penalty under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had fulfilled the conditions for immunity by admitting the income and specifying its manner. As the Assessing Officer did not request further substantiation regarding the income source, the penalty deletion was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:04:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 306 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the penalty under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had fulfilled the conditions for immunity by admitting the income and specifying its manner. As the Assessing Officer did not request further substantiation regarding the income source, the penalty deletion was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>