<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 304 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the share applicants. However, the disallowance of Rs. 1,51,697/- on account of interest-free advances was upheld, as the assessee failed to demonstrate that these advances were for business purposes. The decision was rendered on 1st March 2018 in Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 304 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the share applicants. However, the disallowance of Rs. 1,51,697/- on account of interest-free advances was upheld, as the assessee failed to demonstrate that these advances were for business purposes. The decision was rendered on 1st March 2018 in Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>