<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 297 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for completed units in project &#039;A&#039;, despite project &#039;B&#039; not commencing. The Tribunal considered various factors, including ULCA provisions and PMC certificates, determining project &#039;A&#039; approval in 1999 and completion by 31.03.2008. The AO was instructed to verify completion for eligibility. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deduction for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:04:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 297 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for completed units in project &#039;A&#039;, despite project &#039;B&#039; not commencing. The Tribunal considered various factors, including ULCA provisions and PMC certificates, determining project &#039;A&#039; approval in 1999 and completion by 31.03.2008. The AO was instructed to verify completion for eligibility. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deduction for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>