https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356589 The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Seizure Memo dated 04.10.2017, affirming the levy of Anti Dumping Duty on goods imported by the petitioner as per the Notification dated 11.05.2017. The court found the petitioner's self-assessment lacking and highlighted allegations of Duty evasion. It ruled in favor of the respondents, dismissing the Writ Petition and confirming the lawful interception of the petitioner's attempt to evade Duty. The court also supported the retrospective applicability of the Anti Dumping Duty rules, emphasizing the Duty's chargeability based on the date of filing the Bill of Entry for home consumption. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356589 The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Seizure Memo dated 04.10.2017, affirming the levy of Anti Dumping Duty on goods imported by the petitioner as per the Notification dated 11.05.2017. The court found the petitioner's self-assessment lacking and highlighted allegations of Duty evasion. It ruled in favor of the respondents, dismissing the Writ Petition and confirming the lawful interception of the petitioner's attempt to evade Duty. The court also supported the retrospective applicability of the Anti Dumping Duty rules, emphasizing the Duty's chargeability based on the date of filing the Bill of Entry for home consumption. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356589