<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 285 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356582</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge. It affirmed the jurisdiction of the Additional Director General to issue the show-cause notice, directing the petitioner to respond before the concerned Commissioner for adjudication. The court dismissed the writ petitions and advised the petitioner to present their case for adjudication, while also dismissing the interlocutory application for stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 285 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356582</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge. It affirmed the jurisdiction of the Additional Director General to issue the show-cause notice, directing the petitioner to respond before the concerned Commissioner for adjudication. The court dismissed the writ petitions and advised the petitioner to present their case for adjudication, while also dismissing the interlocutory application for stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>