<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 284 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356581</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the penalties imposed by the Commissioner under sections 112 and 114AA of the Customs Act. It affirmed the service of notice and interpreted prohibited goods broadly, allowing penalties up to the value of the smuggled goods. The court held that goods smuggled by concealment breach fundamental import conditions, making them prohibited, and supported the Commissioner&#039;s authority to impose penalties accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2018 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 284 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356581</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the penalties imposed by the Commissioner under sections 112 and 114AA of the Customs Act. It affirmed the service of notice and interpreted prohibited goods broadly, allowing penalties up to the value of the smuggled goods. The court held that goods smuggled by concealment breach fundamental import conditions, making them prohibited, and supported the Commissioner&#039;s authority to impose penalties accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>