https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356580 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order and the consequential penalty order. The court found the delay in the adjudication process unreasonable, emphasizing that adjudication should occur within a reasonable period, typically five years. The court held that the petitioner was not intentionally or actively responsible for the short landing of the cargo, leading to the vacating of the penalty. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Sep 2018 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356580 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order and the consequential penalty order. The court found the delay in the adjudication process unreasonable, emphasizing that adjudication should occur within a reasonable period, typically five years. The court held that the petitioner was not intentionally or actively responsible for the short landing of the cargo, leading to the vacating of the penalty. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356580