<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 269 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356566</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax to an SEZ unit for specified input services used in authorised operations was held allowable because Notifications Nos. 9/2009-ST and 15/2009-ST only regulate the refund mechanism and cannot curtail the statutory immunity under the SEZ Act. Earlier Tribunal decisions were followed to hold that the amended clause in Notification No. 15/2009-ST could not deny refund merely because the services were consumed wholly within the SEZ. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to refund with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 269 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356566</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax to an SEZ unit for specified input services used in authorised operations was held allowable because Notifications Nos. 9/2009-ST and 15/2009-ST only regulate the refund mechanism and cannot curtail the statutory immunity under the SEZ Act. Earlier Tribunal decisions were followed to hold that the amended clause in Notification No. 15/2009-ST could not deny refund merely because the services were consumed wholly within the SEZ. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to refund with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>