https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356559 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The tribunal found no evidence of the appellant's involvement in the duty evasion by M/s Nitin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing that M/s Nitin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. was the principal manufacturer and the appellant acted as a job worker on their behalf. Consequently, the tribunal held that the appellant should not be penalized, providing consequential relief as necessary. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:01:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356559 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The tribunal found no evidence of the appellant's involvement in the duty evasion by M/s Nitin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing that M/s Nitin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. was the principal manufacturer and the appellant acted as a job worker on their behalf. Consequently, the tribunal held that the appellant should not be penalized, providing consequential relief as necessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356559