https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356558 CENVAT credit was directed to be verified on production of supporting documents, with no further time to be granted and the matter to close if documents were not filed within the stipulated period. The Tribunal also held that a penalty under Rule 26 could not be sustained against a company where an equal penalty had already been imposed in connected proceedings under section 11AC, and the company penalty was set aside. The result was limited relief on credit verification and deletion of the separate penalty. en-us Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:01:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356558 CENVAT credit was directed to be verified on production of supporting documents, with no further time to be granted and the matter to close if documents were not filed within the stipulated period. The Tribunal also held that a penalty under Rule 26 could not be sustained against a company where an equal penalty had already been imposed in connected proceedings under section 11AC, and the company penalty was set aside. The result was limited relief on credit verification and deletion of the separate penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356558