<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Central Excise duty on the green houses classified under 94060011 but allowed the appellant to claim cenvat credit on inputs procured from outside, subject to verification. The benefit of cum duty price was also to be extended to the appellant. The appeals were partially allowed, with modifications to the original order to include these benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Central Excise duty on the green houses classified under 94060011 but allowed the appellant to claim cenvat credit on inputs procured from outside, subject to verification. The benefit of cum duty price was also to be extended to the appellant. The appeals were partially allowed, with modifications to the original order to include these benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>