<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356553</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside all impugned orders and allowed all appeals, concluding that the vehicles and chassis were correctly classified by the appellants, and the demands for differential NCCD and excise duty were unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356553</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside all impugned orders and allowed all appeals, concluding that the vehicles and chassis were correctly classified by the appellants, and the demands for differential NCCD and excise duty were unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>