<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 255 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 11AC(1)(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 only pertains to duty evasion cases involving fraud or collusion, not confiscation matters. Payment of duty and interest under this section should conclude proceedings without further adjudication on confiscation. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order and clarifying the application of the provision to reduce litigation and promptly conclude proceedings upon payment of dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 255 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 11AC(1)(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 only pertains to duty evasion cases involving fraud or collusion, not confiscation matters. Payment of duty and interest under this section should conclude proceedings without further adjudication on confiscation. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order and clarifying the application of the provision to reduce litigation and promptly conclude proceedings upon payment of dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>