https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356551 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original NO. 13/2015 dated 28/10/2015 due to a violation of natural justice in the cross-examination of buyers in a case involving clandestine removal of goods. Emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence and adherence to procedural fairness, the Tribunal remanded the matter for further proceedings, highlighting the importance of Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the adjudicating authority's discretion in relying on evidence. The decision underscored the significance of ensuring compliance with legal requirements and cooperation in the legal process. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:01:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356551 The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original NO. 13/2015 dated 28/10/2015 due to a violation of natural justice in the cross-examination of buyers in a case involving clandestine removal of goods. Emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence and adherence to procedural fairness, the Tribunal remanded the matter for further proceedings, highlighting the importance of Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the adjudicating authority's discretion in relying on evidence. The decision underscored the significance of ensuring compliance with legal requirements and cooperation in the legal process. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356551