<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands raised against the appellants for the clearance of physician samples. It emphasized adherence to valuation rules under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the need for compliance with relevant legal provisions over inoperable circular instructions. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal precedents and correct interpretation of valuation rules in resolving disputes related to physician sample clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands raised against the appellants for the clearance of physician samples. It emphasized adherence to valuation rules under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the need for compliance with relevant legal provisions over inoperable circular instructions. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal precedents and correct interpretation of valuation rules in resolving disputes related to physician sample clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>