https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356543 The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority due to insufficient details in the appeal record regarding Cenvat credit claims on civil construction post-amendment. The appellant was granted a de novo hearing opportunity for presenting their case effectively. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for further assessment based on a comprehensive verification of relevant documents to determine the eligibility of the Cenvat credit post-amendment. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of a detailed review of the contracts and invoices for a fair decision. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 07:00:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356543 The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority due to insufficient details in the appeal record regarding Cenvat credit claims on civil construction post-amendment. The appellant was granted a de novo hearing opportunity for presenting their case effectively. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for further assessment based on a comprehensive verification of relevant documents to determine the eligibility of the Cenvat credit post-amendment. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of a detailed review of the contracts and invoices for a fair decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356543