https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199622 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, ruling that no duty demand or interest should be levied under the Chewing Tobacco and Un-manufactured Tobacco Packing Machines Rules, 2010. The appellant's timely duty payments before the end of each month, despite operating the machines in the last week, were deemed compliant with the 3rd proviso to Rule 9. The Tribunal held that no delayed payment justified interest imposition, aligning with previous decisions and the interpretation of relevant Rules. en-us Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199622 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, ruling that no duty demand or interest should be levied under the Chewing Tobacco and Un-manufactured Tobacco Packing Machines Rules, 2010. The appellant's timely duty payments before the end of each month, despite operating the machines in the last week, were deemed compliant with the 3rd proviso to Rule 9. The Tribunal held that no delayed payment justified interest imposition, aligning with previous decisions and the interpretation of relevant Rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199622