<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 74 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12153</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a limited foreign company, in a case challenging notices issued for reassessment beyond the prescribed four-year period under the Income-tax Act. The court found that the notices were issued without any failure on the part of the assessee as required by the proviso to section 147. The court emphasized that the reasons provided for reassessment did not establish any failure or omission by the assessee, and reliance on certain sections was deemed insufficient to override the conditions of the proviso. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 74 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12153</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a limited foreign company, in a case challenging notices issued for reassessment beyond the prescribed four-year period under the Income-tax Act. The court found that the notices were issued without any failure on the part of the assessee as required by the proviso to section 147. The court emphasized that the reasons provided for reassessment did not establish any failure or omission by the assessee, and reliance on certain sections was deemed insufficient to override the conditions of the proviso. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>