<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1356 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199632</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the Assessee had not concealed material particulars warranting a penalty, as the amount claimed as &#039;Administrative Expenses&#039; was supported by evidence and disclosure in the income computation. The Court deemed the ITAT&#039;s decision reasonable and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1356 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199632</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the Assessee had not concealed material particulars warranting a penalty, as the amount claimed as &#039;Administrative Expenses&#039; was supported by evidence and disclosure in the income computation. The Court deemed the ITAT&#039;s decision reasonable and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>