https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199615 In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, findings of fact may be disturbed only for a substantial error or defect in procedure, not for mere erroneous appreciation of evidence. A failure to discuss every reason given by the trial court, or a less detailed appellate judgment, does not itself amount to such a defect. Because the dispute depended on factual issues concerning the validity and binding nature of the release deed, and the lower appellate court had decided those issues on evidence, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappraising those findings and reversing the decree. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 17:26:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199615 In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, findings of fact may be disturbed only for a substantial error or defect in procedure, not for mere erroneous appreciation of evidence. A failure to discuss every reason given by the trial court, or a less detailed appellate judgment, does not itself amount to such a defect. Because the dispute depended on factual issues concerning the validity and binding nature of the release deed, and the lower appellate court had decided those issues on evidence, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappraising those findings and reversing the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199615