https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199613 The Federal Court upheld the High Court's decision that the properties were acquired with Sundaram Ayyar's funds and were benami transactions in Akilandammal's name. The settlement deed was deemed void, and the properties were declared part of Sundaram Ayyar's estate. The defendants' suppression of evidence led to an adverse inference against them. The principle of not disturbing lower courts' concurrent findings was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 17:24:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199613 The Federal Court upheld the High Court's decision that the properties were acquired with Sundaram Ayyar's funds and were benami transactions in Akilandammal's name. The settlement deed was deemed void, and the properties were declared part of Sundaram Ayyar's estate. The defendants' suppression of evidence led to an adverse inference against them. The principle of not disturbing lower courts' concurrent findings was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Dec 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199613