https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199611 An amendment to limitation law does not revive a claim already barred under the prior law, because later enactments apply retrospectively only to pending or future proceedings where the right to sue was still subsisting. The court treated the earlier Limitation Acts and the General Clauses Act as reflecting the rule that a barred remedy is not restored by amendment, even if the underlying debt may continue in some other sense. The suit remained barred by limitation and could not be enforced in court. en-us Fri, 21 Apr 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 15:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199611 An amendment to limitation law does not revive a claim already barred under the prior law, because later enactments apply retrospectively only to pending or future proceedings where the right to sue was still subsisting. The court treated the earlier Limitation Acts and the General Clauses Act as reflecting the rule that a barred remedy is not restored by amendment, even if the underlying debt may continue in some other sense. The suit remained barred by limitation and could not be enforced in court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Apr 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199611