https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199607 Jurisdiction of civil courts under Section 9 CPC remains the rule, and exclusion must be express or arise by necessary implication. In a challenge to the election of directors, the absence of any express bar in the Companies Act meant the dispute was open to civil adjudication, and a declaration that the election is void was to be sought by civil suit rather than by petition before the Court. On that basis, the petition was held not maintainable before the Court and was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the appropriate civil remedy. en-us Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:14:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199607 Jurisdiction of civil courts under Section 9 CPC remains the rule, and exclusion must be express or arise by necessary implication. In a challenge to the election of directors, the absence of any express bar in the Companies Act meant the dispute was open to civil adjudication, and a declaration that the election is void was to be sought by civil suit rather than by petition before the Court. On that basis, the petition was held not maintainable before the Court and was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the appropriate civil remedy. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199607