<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 117 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199606</link>
    <description>A tenancy may be terminated by written notice sent by post, tendered or delivered personally, or, where personal tender or delivery is impracticable, by affixture to a conspicuous part of the property. Properly addressed and prepaid registered post attracts deemed service under Section 27 of the Mysore General Clauses Act, 1899, and postal dispatch may also support a presumption under Section 114(f) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Repeated return of the registered notices, earlier unsuccessful service attempts, and a certificate of posting supported due service. On the stated facts, personal service was impracticable and affixture was sufficient, so the notice of termination was valid and duly served.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 117 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199606</link>
      <description>A tenancy may be terminated by written notice sent by post, tendered or delivered personally, or, where personal tender or delivery is impracticable, by affixture to a conspicuous part of the property. Properly addressed and prepaid registered post attracts deemed service under Section 27 of the Mysore General Clauses Act, 1899, and postal dispatch may also support a presumption under Section 114(f) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Repeated return of the registered notices, earlier unsuccessful service attempts, and a certificate of posting supported due service. On the stated facts, personal service was impracticable and affixture was sufficient, so the notice of termination was valid and duly served.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>